Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnSquareMore
Paxos Accidentally Mints $300 Trillion in PYUSD Stablecoins

Paxos Accidentally Mints $300 Trillion in PYUSD Stablecoins

BeInCryptoBeInCrypto2025/10/15 14:38
By:Landon Manning

Paxos’ accidental minting of $300 trillion in PYUSD shook confidence in stablecoins, underscoring the absence of proof-of-reserve safeguards and prompting fresh scrutiny of the industry’s transparency.

Paxos accidentally minted $300 trillion in PYUSD today, prompting community incredulity. The firm quickly burned these tokens and minted $300 million, claiming user error.

This gaffe has highlighted a real concern in stablecoins: these protocols don’t need proof of reserves to mint tokens. Web3-native solutions could power new mechanisms, but issuers may not wish to implement them.

Paxos’ PYUSD Blunder

PayPal has been expanding its PYUSD stablecoin recently, adding new blockchains with a series of partnerships. One recent incident, however, may shake confidence in the token and its entire sector. In an apparent error, Paxos minted $300 trillion worth of PYUSD today, which is more money than exists in the entire world economy:

well there's the national debt solved

— Molly White (@molly0xFFF) October 15, 2025

Paxos quickly burned the PYUSD and minted a much more reasonable $300 million around an hour later. This led commentators to suspect a “fat finger” typo, where a user accidentally inputted the wrong number of zeroes. The firm later obliquely confirmed these rumors, saying that no foul play took place.

At 3:12 PM EST, Paxos mistakenly minted excess PYUSD as part of an internal transfer. Paxos immediately identified the error and burned the excess PYUSD. This was an internal technical error. There is no security breach. Customer funds are safe. We have addressed the root…

— Paxos (@Paxos) October 15, 2025

A Big Problem for Stablecoins

Still, though, this incident has caused a lot of concern from industry observers. The stablecoin market is larger than ever, firms are aiming for unprecedented valuations, and the US government has major policy plans for this sector. Shouldn’t there be more guardrails to prevent Paxos from accidentally minting this much PYUSD?

Furthermore, Paxos has had a few run-ins with the law, and PYUSD also faces community scrutiny. Almost exactly one year ago, PYUSD’s market cap dropped 40% without warning, raising fears of manipulation. These red flags have been visible, yet there was no safeguard to prevent this massive token minting.

Specifically, blockchains are meant to be trustless. It’d be easy to hard-code a mechanism into the blockchain that’d prevent Paxos from minting this PYUSD without sufficient collateral. This incident conclusively reveals that there’s no such function in place; protocols can mint stablecoins without any proof of reserves.

This sort of behavior is all over the stablecoin industry. Although Tether has been preparing for a third-party audit for several months now, no audit has actually taken place. Most stablecoins haven’t suffered such ridiculous errors like Paxos and PYUSD did today, but we don’t have any real proof that other tokens actually possess bigger guardrails.

In other words, signs like this are very concerning for the entire sector. Even though Paxos cleaned up its error quickly, this never should’ve happened. Gaffes like this could damage TradFi’s commitment to stablecoin investment.

0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

PoolX: Earn new token airdrops
Lock your assets and earn 10%+ APR
Lock now!

You may also like

After a 1460% surge, re-examining the value foundation of ZEC

History has repeatedly shown that extremely short payback periods (super high ROI) are often precursors to mining disasters and sharp declines in coin prices.

BlockBeats2025/11/22 18:12
After a 1460% surge, re-examining the value foundation of ZEC

Tom Lee reveals: The crash was caused by the 1011 liquidity crunch, with market makers selling off to fill a "financial black hole"

Lee stated directly: Market makers are essentially like the central banks of crypto. When their balance sheets are damaged, liquidity tightens and the market becomes fragile.

BlockBeats2025/11/22 18:11
Tom Lee reveals: The crash was caused by the 1011 liquidity crunch, with market makers selling off to fill a "financial black hole"

Boxing champion Andrew Tate's "Going to Zero": How did he lose $720,000 on Hyperliquid?

Andrew Tate hardly engages in risk management and tends to re-enter losing trades with higher leverage.

ForesightNews 速递2025/11/22 17:53
Boxing champion Andrew Tate's "Going to Zero": How did he lose $720,000 on Hyperliquid?

New Beginnings in the Darkest Hour: Is the Dawn of Bitcoin in 2026 Already Visible?

Risk assets are expected to perform strongly in 2026, and bitcoin is likely to strengthen as well.

Chaincatcher2025/11/22 17:30
New Beginnings in the Darkest Hour: Is the Dawn of Bitcoin in 2026 Already Visible?