PLUME drops 16.29% amid heightened market volatility and negative technical signals
- PLUME dropped 16.29% on Sep 25, 2025, with a 335.29% 24-hour decline and 1,263.25% 7-day drop. - Bearish technical indicators (RSI <30, MACD crossover) and broken support levels intensified downward pressure. - Algorithmic traders and hedge funds adjusted positions, monitoring $4.00 as critical near-term support. - A backtesting strategy using moving averages, RSI, and MACD aims to validate bearish signals for live trading.
On September 25, 2025,
The steep drop in PLUME’s price during the session highlights mounting market stress amid uncertain macroeconomic conditions and persistent bearish sentiment. Short-term market participants are responding to deteriorating technical signals, including the RSI and MACD, both of which have shifted into negative territory. The RSI has fallen under 30, signaling oversold status, while the MACD has crossed beneath its signal line, further confirming the bearish outlook. Furthermore, the asset has breached significant support zones that previously helped stabilize its price, raising the chances of continued declines.
These recent developments have drawn greater attention from algorithmic traders and quantitative hedge funds, who are now repositioning in expectation of a prolonged downtrend. These market players typically rely on technical analysis and backtesting to optimize their trading strategies. At present, traders are focusing on the $4.00 mark as a possible short-term support; a move below this threshold could trigger additional technical selling.
Backtest Hypothesis
A backtesting approach has been implemented to assess a group of technical indicators for potential trade entry and exit points, utilizing PLUME’s historical price movements. This method combines moving averages, RSI, and MACD crossover signals. The main concept is to initiate a short position when the 50-period moving average drops below the 200-period moving average (death cross), the RSI dips under 30, and the MACD line falls beneath the signal line. Exits are triggered if any of these indicators shift back to bullish, or if the price hits a predetermined stop-loss below a critical support level.
This approach aims to take advantage of bearish momentum while reducing risk from sudden market reversals. By applying the strategy to historical data, the goal is to determine whether these signals can be effectively used in real-time trading. The results of the backtest will indicate if this combination of indicators successfully identifies downside opportunities and avoids misleading signals during upward trends.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Blockchain’s Defense Dilemma: Tackling Present-Day Attacks and the Emerging Quantum Challenge
- Port3 Network suffered a $14.45M loss after a hacker exploited a BridgeIn protocol flaw to mint and dump 162.75M PORT3 tokens, triggering an 82% price crash. - The attacker burned 837.25M tokens post-sale, while Port3 halted liquidity and deposits to contain the damage, though the token remains at $0.0086. - QANplatform's quantum-resistant QAN XLINK protocol passed a Hacken audit, addressing long-term risks as 65% of Ethereum addresses face quantum vulnerability. - The incident highlights DeFi's dual thr

Market Consolidation Near Breakout Zone: 5 Altcoins Traders Are Watching for the Next Major Move

Massive Setup Ahead: 5 High-Risk Altcoins Posting +40% Monthly Gains and Poised for a 2x–3x Move

Bitcoin ETF Volume Hits a New 11.5B Peak as IBIT Drives 8B Flow Today
