Australia’s ASIC cuts compliance burden for stablecoin intermediariesHow does ASIC’s exemption impact stablecoin intermediaries?
Stablecoin intermediaries in Australia have been allowed to distribute licensed stablecoins without having to hold a separate financial services license as per a “first-of-its-kind” special exemption granted by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
- ASIC has granted a first-of-its-kind exemption allowing Stablecoin intermediaries to distribute licensed stablecoins without separate licenses.
- Catena Digital’s AUDM is the first stablecoin to qualify under the exemption.
- The relief comes in response to a December 2024 consultation paper issued by ASIC.
According to ASIC, the exemption is an “important step in facilitating growth and innovation in the digital assets and payments sectors,” and only applies to stablecoins issued by firms that have acquired the Australian financial services license.
How does ASIC’s exemption impact stablecoin intermediaries?
The exemption means crypto exchanges and other intermediaries can save on compliance costs and offer access to select regulated stablecoins without the burden of extra licensing.
“ASIC is committed to supporting responsible innovation in the rapidly evolving digital assets space, while ensuring important consumer protections are in place by having eligible stablecoins issued under an AFS licence,” the regulator said.
So far, only Catena Digital, an Australian stablecoin issuer, has been granted an AFS license, and therefore, its Australian dollar-denominated stablecoin, AUDM, is the first to qualify under the new exemption.
However, intermediaries that offer AUDM will be required to provide its product disclosure statement to clients, to ensure transparency and allow locals to make informed decisions.
ASIC also plans to extend this relief to additional stablecoin issuers as they become licensed.
As of now, the relief will take effect once it is registered on the Federal Register of Legislation, which is the official step required for it to become legally binding.
ASIC set to formalize crypto rules
The exemption is a direct response to concerns raised during ASIC’s consultation on crypto regulation, which was outlined in Consultation Paper 381, which the regulator published late last year.
“Many digital assets and related products are financial products under the current law. Stakeholders have been calling for greater clarity, and in response, we are releasing our draft updated guidance,” ASIC commissioner Alan Kirkland said at the time.
In that paper, ASIC proposed several updates to its digital assets guidance, INFO 225, to better accommodate digital assets, and included practical examples of how existing financial product definitions could apply to stablecoins, wrapped tokens, exchange-native tokens, and even meme coins.
ASIC is currently finalizing the updates and said it would publish the revised INFO 225, along with key themes and public submissions from the consultation, in the coming weeks.
Simultaneously, the regulator said it was “working closely” with the country’s Treasury department to develop a stablecoin framework.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
After bitcoin returns to $90,000, is Christmas or a Christmas crash coming next?
This Thanksgiving, we are grateful for bitcoin returning to $90,000.

Bitcoin security reaches a historic high, but miner revenue drops to a historic low. Where will mining companies find new sources of income?
The current paradox of the Bitcoin network is particularly striking: while the protocol layer has never been more secure due to high hash power, the underlying mining industry is facing pressure from capital liquidation and consolidation.

What are the privacy messaging apps Session and SimpleX donated by Vitalik?
Why did Vitalik take action? From content encryption to metadata privacy.

The covert war escalates: Hyperliquid faces a "kamikaze" attack, but the real battle may have just begun
The attacker incurred a loss of 3 million in a "suicidal" attack, but may have achieved breakeven through external hedging. This appears more like a low-cost "stress test" targeting the protocol's defensive capabilities.

